<teammate-message teammate_id="dev-backend-p1" color="orange" summary="All 7 QA issues fixed and verified">
All 7 QA issues have been fixed and verified:

**Critical fixes:**
1. Created `resources/views/components/layouts/guest.blade.php` - minimal layout with Vite assets and Flux styles/scripts
2. Added customer auth routes to `routes/web.php`: `/account/login`, `/account/register`, `/account` (protected), `/account/logout` (protected)
3. Added `/admin` dashboard route - auth-protected, renders placeholder view, redirects unauthenticated users to login

**Minor fixes:**
4. Admin seeder now creates `admin@acme.test` (password: `password`) with name "Admin User" and role `owner` on Store 1
5. New `CustomerSeeder` seeds `customer@acme.test` (password: `password`), name "John Doe" for Store 1
6. StoreDomain seeder already correctly creates `acme-fashion.test` with type `storefront` - verified, no change needed
7. Middleware alias `auth.customer` uses dot notation which is the correct Laravel 12 convention - verified, no change needed

**Verification:**
- `vendor/bin/pint --dirty --format agent` - pass (no issues)
- `php artisan test --compact` - 235 tests, 369 assertions, all passing
- `php artisan migrate:fresh --seed` - all seeders run successfully
- Verified seeded data via tinker: admin user, store, domain, customer all correct
</teammate-message>

<teammate-message teammate_id="dev-backend-p1" color="orange">
{"type":"idle_notification","from":"dev-backend-p1","timestamp":"2026-03-20T06:52:46.506Z","idleReason":"available"}
</teammate-message>


Good. All fixes applied and verified. Now the QA Analyst needs to re-test.


SendMessage

The developer has fixed all 7 issues you reported. Please re-test everything:

**What was fixed:**
1. Admin login page - guest layout Blade file created
2. Customer routes - /account/login, /account/register, /account, /account/logout now registered
3. Admin dashboard - /admin route added with auth redirect
4. Admin seeder - now uses admin@acme.test with owner role
5. Customer seeder - customer@acme.test, "John Doe", Store 1
6. Store domain - verified acme-fashion.test already correct
7. Middleware alias - auth.customer uses correct Laravel 12 dot convention

Please run a fresh `php artisan migrate:fresh --seed` first, then re-run all browser tests. Update `work/phase-1/qa-report.md` with the re-test results, documenting the original failures, what was fixed, and the re-test outcomes. Every entry must be PASS for Phase 1 to proceed.

Summary: Re-test after all 7 fixes applied

The developer has fixed all 7 issues you reported. Please re-test everything:

**What was fixed:**
1. Admin login page - guest layout Blade file created
2. Customer routes - /account/login, /account/register, /account, /account/logout now registered
3. Admin dashboard - /admin route added with auth redirect
4. Admin seeder - now uses admin@acme.test with owner role
5. Customer seeder - customer@acme.test, "John Doe", Store 1
6. Store domain - verified acme-fashion.test already correct
7. Middleware alias - auth.customer uses correct Laravel 12 dot convention

Please run a fresh `php artisan migrate:fresh --seed` first, then re-run all browser tests. Update `work/phase-1/qa-report.md` with the re-test results, documenting the original failures, what was fixed, and the re-test outcomes. Every entry must be PASS for Phase 1 to proceed.


Message sent to qa-analyst-p1's inbox

Summary: Re-test after all 7 fixes applied

The developer has fixed all 7 issues you reported. Please re-test everything:

**What was fixed:**
1. Admin login page - guest layout Blade file created
2. Customer routes - /account/login, /account/register, /account, /account/logout now registered
3. Admin dashboard - /admin route added with auth redirect
4. Admin seeder - now uses admin@acme.test with owner role
5. Customer seeder - customer@acme.test, "John Doe", Store 1
6. Store domain - verified acme-fashion.test already correct
7. Middleware alias - auth.customer uses correct Laravel 12 dot convention

Please run a fresh `php artisan migrate:fresh --seed` first, then re-run all browser tests. Update `work/phase-1/qa-report.md` with the re-test results, documenting the original failures, what was fixed, and the re-test outcomes. Every entry must be PASS for Phase 1 to proceed.

Message sent to qa-analyst-p1's inbox

Summary: Re-test after all 7 fixes applied


These are Intelephense false positives - Pest's `beforeEach` property binding and a seeder class that exists but hasn't been indexed yet. Not blocking issues. Waiting for the QA Analyst's re-test results.


<teammate-message teammate_id="qa-analyst-p1" color="cyan" summary="Re-test: 9/17 PASS, 3 new critical issues found">
Phase 1 re-test complete. Report updated at `work/phase-1/qa-report.md`.

**Progress: 9/17 browser tests PASS (was 1/17)**

The 7 original fixes are confirmed working: login pages render, routes registered, seeder data correct, customer routes exist. However, 3 new critical issues were found during re-testing:

**New Issue A: Dashboard layout component not found (blocks 4 tests)**
Both `admin/dashboard.blade.php` and `storefront/account/dashboard.blade.php` use `<x-layouts.app>` which looks for `resources/views/components/layouts/app.blade.php`. This file does not exist. The layout is at `resources/views/layouts/app.blade.php` (wrong location for `<x-` syntax). This crashes both dashboards with 500 after successful login, also blocking logout testing.

**New Issue B: Wrong admin unauthenticated redirect (blocks 1 test)**
Unauthenticated GET to `/admin` redirects to `/login` (Fortify default) instead of `/admin/login`. The `auth` middleware uses the default `login` named route. Needs custom redirect for admin routes.

**New Issue C: Missing storefront middleware on customer routes (blocks 2 tests)**
The `/account/*` routes use only `web` middleware, not the `storefront` middleware group. This means `ResolveStore` never runs and `current_store` is never bound. Customer registration crashes with `Target class [current_store] does not exist.` at `Register.php:25`. Fix: apply `storefront` middleware group to account routes.

**Minor: `@fluxStyles` text leak** -- The Flux Blade directive appears as raw text on all Livewire pages. Cosmetic only, forms work.

These 3 issues need fixing before Phase 1 can pass.
</teammate-message>

<teammate-message teammate_id="qa-analyst-p1" color="cyan">
{"type":"idle_notification","from":"qa-analyst-p1","timestamp":"2026-03-20T06:58:59.645Z","idleReason":"available"}
</teammate-message>


More issues found. Sending the developer back for round 2 of fixes.


QA re-test found 3 more critical issues. Please fix:

**Issue A: Dashboard layout component not found (500 errors)**
Both `admin/dashboard.blade.php` and `storefront/account/dashboard.blade.php` use `<x-layouts.app>` which looks for `resources/views/components/layouts/app.blade.php`. This file does not exist. The layout is at `resources/views/layouts/app.blade.php`. Fix options:
- Move layouts to `resources/views/components/layouts/` (so `<x-layouts.app>` works), OR
- Change the Blade templates to use `@extends('layouts.app')` instead of component syntax
Choose whichever is more consistent with Livewire v4 conventions. Search the docs first.

**Issue B: Wrong admin unauthenticated redirect**
Unauthenticated GET to `/admin` redirects to `/login` (Fortify/default) instead of `/admin/login`. The `auth` middleware uses the default login route. Fix: configure a custom redirect for admin routes. In Laravel 12, you can customize this in `bootstrap/app.php` within the `withMiddleware` callback using `redirectGuestsTo` or by handling the `Authenticate` middleware's redirect path.

**Issue C: Missing storefront middleware on customer routes**
The `/account/*` routes only use `web` middleware. `ResolveStore` never runs so `current_store` is never bound, causing customer registration to crash. Fix: apply the `storefront` middleware group to the account routes so the store is resolved from the hostname.

**Minor: @fluxStyles text leak**
The `@fluxStyles` and `@fluxScripts` directives render as raw text. This likely means the Flux service provider is not loading. Check that `livewire/flux` is properly installed and its service provider is registered. Run `composer show livewire/flux` to verify installation.

After fixing, run `vendor/bin/pint --dirty --format agent` and `php artisan test --compact` to verify. Then message me.

Summary: Fix 3 new critical QA issues

QA re-test found 3 more critical issues. Please fix:

**Issue A: Dashboard layout component not found (500 errors)**
Both `admin/dashboard.blade.php` and `storefront/account/dashboard.blade.php` use `<x-layouts.app>` which looks for `resources/views/components/layouts/app.blade.php`. This file does not exist. The layout is at `resources/views/layouts/app.blade.php`. Fix options:
- Move layouts to `resources/views/components/layouts/` (so `<x-layouts.app>` works), OR
- Change the Blade templates to use `@extends('layouts.app')` instead of component syntax
Choose whichever is more consistent with Livewire v4 conventions. Search the docs first.

**Issue B: Wrong admin unauthenticated redirect**
Unauthenticated GET to `/admin` redirects to `/login` (Fortify/default) instead of `/admin/login`. The `auth` middleware uses the default login route. Fix: configure a custom redirect for admin routes. In Laravel 12, you can customize this in `bootstrap/app.php` within the `withMiddleware` callback using `redirectGuestsTo` or by handling the `Authenticate` middleware's redirect path.

**Issue C: Missing storefront middleware on customer routes**
The `/account/*` routes only use `web` middleware. `ResolveStore` never runs so `current_store` is never bound, causing customer registration to crash. Fix: apply the `storefront` middleware group to the account routes so the store is resolved from the hostname.

**Minor: @fluxStyles text leak**
The `@fluxStyles` and `@fluxScripts` directives render as raw text. This likely means the Flux service provider is not loading. Check that `livewire/flux` is properly installed and its service provider is registered. Run `composer show livewire/flux` to verify installation.

After fixing, run `vendor/bin/pint --dirty --format agent` and `php artisan test --compact` to verify. Then message me.


Message sent to dev-backend-p1's inbox

Summary: Fix 3 new critical QA issues

QA re-test found 3 more critical issues. Please fix:

**Issue A: Dashboard layout component not found (500 errors)**
Both `admin/dashboard.blade.php` and `storefront/account/dashboard.blade.php` use `<x-layouts.app>` which looks for `resources/views/components/layouts/app.blade.php`. This file does not exist. The layout is at `resources/views/layouts/app.blade.php`. Fix options:
- Move layouts to `resources/views/components/layouts/` (so `<x-layouts.app>` works), OR
- Change the Blade templates to use `@extends('layouts.app')` instead of component syntax
Choose whichever is more consistent with Livewire v4 conventions. Search the docs first.

**Issue B: Wrong admin unauthenticated redirect**
Unauthenticated GET to `/admin` redirects to `/login` (Fortify/default) instead of `/admin/login`. The `auth` middleware uses the default login route. Fix: configure a custom redirect for admin routes. In Laravel 12, you can customize this in `bootstrap/app.php` within the `withMiddleware` callback using `redirectGuestsTo` or by handling the `Authenticate` middleware's redirect path.

**Issue C: Missing storefront middleware on customer routes**
The `/account/*` routes only use `web` middleware. `ResolveStore` never runs so `current_store` is never bound, causing customer registration to crash. Fix: apply the `storefront` middleware group to the account routes so the store is resolved from the hostname.

**Minor: @fluxStyles text leak**
The `@fluxStyles` and `@fluxScripts` directives render as raw text. This likely means the Flux service provider is not loading. Check that `livewire/flux` is properly installed and its service provider is registered. Run `composer show livewire/flux` to verify installation.

After fixing, run `vendor/bin/pint --dirty --format agent` and `php artisan test --compact` to verify. Then message me.

Message sent to dev-backend-p1's inbox

Summary: Fix 3 new critical QA issues


Waiting for the developer to fix the 3 new issues found during QA re-testing.


<teammate-message teammate_id="dev-backend-p1" color="orange" summary="All 4 QA issues fixed, tests passing">
All 3 critical issues and the minor issue are fixed:

**Issue A - Dashboard layout 500 errors (fixed):**
- Created `resources/views/layouts/guest.blade.php` using Livewire v4 convention (matching the existing `auth/simple.blade.php` layout style, using `@include('partials.head')` and `@fluxScripts`)
- Updated all 3 Livewire components to use `->layout('layouts::guest')` instead of the v3-style `components.layouts.guest`
- Fixed dashboard views to use `<x-layouts::app>` (double colon namespace syntax) instead of `<x-layouts.app>` (dot syntax), matching the existing `dashboard.blade.php`
- Removed the incorrect `resources/views/components/layouts/guest.blade.php`

**Issue B - Wrong admin redirect (fixed):**
- Added `redirectGuestsTo` closure in `bootstrap/app.php` that checks `$request->is('admin', 'admin/*')` and redirects to `route('admin.login')`, falling back to `route('login')` for all other routes

**Issue C - Missing storefront middleware (fixed):**
- Added `->middleware(['storefront'])` to the `/account` route group so `ResolveStore` runs and `current_store` is bound before customer auth components execute

**Minor - @fluxStyles text leak (fixed):**
- Removed `@fluxStyles` (does not exist in Flux v2) from the guest layout. Used `@fluxScripts` only, consistent with all existing layouts. Head assets load via `@include('partials.head')` which includes `@fluxAppearance`.

**Verification:**
- `vendor/bin/pint --dirty --format agent` - pass
- `php artisan test --compact` - 235 tests, 369 assertions, all passing
</teammate-message>

<teammate-message teammate_id="dev-backend-p1" color="orange">
{"type":"idle_notification","from":"dev-backend-p1","timestamp":"2026-03-20T07:01:37.580Z","idleReason":"available"}
</teammate-message>


Fixes applied. Sending the QA Analyst back for re-test round 2.


The developer has fixed all 4 issues:

1. Layout 500s fixed - Livewire v4 layout conventions now used correctly
2. Admin unauthenticated redirect now goes to /admin/login
3. Customer routes now use storefront middleware group
4. @fluxStyles text leak removed

Please run `php artisan migrate:fresh --seed` first, then re-test ALL 17 browser scenarios. Update `work/phase-1/qa-report.md` with the complete re-test results. Document original failures, fixes, and re-test outcomes for each previously failing test. Every entry must be PASS.

Summary: Re-test all scenarios after round 2 fixes

The developer has fixed all 4 issues:

1. Layout 500s fixed - Livewire v4 layout conventions now used correctly
2. Admin unauthenticated redirect now goes to /admin/login
3. Customer routes now use storefront middleware group
4. @fluxStyles text leak removed

Please run `php artisan migrate:fresh --seed` first, then re-test ALL 17 browser scenarios. Update `work/phase-1/qa-report.md` with the complete re-test results. Document original failures, fixes, and re-test outcomes for each previously failing test. Every entry must be PASS.


Message sent to qa-analyst-p1's inbox

Summary: Re-test all scenarios after round 2 fixes

The developer has fixed all 4 issues:

1. Layout 500s fixed - Livewire v4 layout conventions now used correctly
2. Admin unauthenticated redirect now goes to /admin/login
3. Customer routes now use storefront middleware group
4. @fluxStyles text leak removed

Please run `php artisan migrate:fresh --seed` first, then re-test ALL 17 browser scenarios. Update `work/phase-1/qa-report.md` with the complete re-test results. Document original failures, fixes, and re-test outcomes for each previously failing test. Every entry must be PASS.

Message sent to qa-analyst-p1's inbox


Standard Intelephense false positive for Laravel's exception handler callback. Waiting for QA re-test results.


<teammate-message teammate_id="qa-analyst-p1" color="cyan" summary="Round 3: 12/17 PASS, 4 issues remain including Livewire middleware gap">
Phase 1 Round 3 re-test complete. Report updated at `work/phase-1/qa-report.md`.

**Progress: 12/17 PASS (was 9/17)**

The layout fixes work -- admin dashboard renders, @fluxStyles leak gone, admin unauth redirect correct. But 4 new/persistent issues remain:

**Issue E: Seeder missing shop.test store domain**
The `storefront` middleware on `/account/*` routes resolves from hostname. `shop.test` is NOT in the seeder. All customer routes return 404 until I manually added `shop.test` via tinker. Seeder needs to include `shop.test`.

**Issue F: Admin logout redirects to / instead of /admin/login**
The layout's "Log Out" button uses Fortify's POST /logout route (redirects to /), not the custom POST /admin/logout route (redirects to /admin/login). The user IS logged out, but lands on the wrong page.

**Issue G: Customer dashboard 500 - wrong auth guard in layout**
`storefront/account/dashboard.blade.php` uses `layouts.app` which has `auth()->user()->name` in the sidebar (line 33 of sidebar.blade.php). Customers use the `customer` guard, so `auth()->user()` returns null. Customer pages need their own layout or the layout needs guard-awareness.

**Issue H: Customer registration 500 - current_store not bound on Livewire update**
This is the most architecturally significant issue. The `storefront` middleware binds `current_store` on the initial page GET, but Livewire's action POSTs go to `/livewire/update` which only has `web` middleware. So `app('current_store')` in `Register.php:25` fails. The component needs to resolve the store directly from `request()->getHost()` instead of relying on middleware-bound container state. This will affect ALL storefront Livewire components.

These 4 issues need fixing before Phase 1 can pass.
</teammate-message>

<teammate-message teammate_id="qa-analyst-p1" color="cyan">
{"type":"idle_notification","from":"qa-analyst-p1","timestamp":"2026-03-20T07:08:42.760Z","idleReason":"available"}
</teammate-message>


Issue H is architecturally significant - it will affect all storefront Livewire components going forward. Let me get the developer on these fixes.


QA round 3 found 4 more issues. Issue H is architecturally critical and must be solved properly.

**Issue E: Seeder missing shop.test store domain**
The storefront middleware resolves store from hostname. `shop.test` (the Herd default domain) is NOT in the seeder. Add a `shop.test` StoreDomain record pointing to Store 1 with type `storefront` in the seeder. This way the app works on both `acme-fashion.test` and `shop.test`.

**Issue F: Admin logout redirects to / instead of /admin/login**
The admin layout's logout button POSTs to Fortify's `/logout` route which redirects to `/`. It should use the custom `/admin/logout` route. Fix the admin layout's logout form action to point to the correct admin logout route.

**Issue G: Customer dashboard 500 - wrong auth guard**
The storefront layout uses `auth()->user()->name` which checks the default `web` guard. Customers use the `customer` guard so `auth()->user()` returns null. Fix: customer pages need their own layout, or the layout needs to check `auth('customer')->user()`. Create a separate storefront layout that uses the customer guard.

**Issue H: CRITICAL - current_store not bound during Livewire update requests**
The `storefront` middleware binds `current_store` on the initial GET, but Livewire action POSTs go to `/livewire/update` which only has `web` middleware. So `app('current_store')` fails during Livewire component actions.

The proper fix is to make store resolution work globally for any request with a storefront hostname. Options:
1. Register `ResolveStore` as a global middleware (applied on every request), not just in the `storefront` group. It should detect storefront domains by hostname and bind the store. For admin routes, it still uses session.
2. Or register it in Livewire's update middleware. Search the Livewire docs for how to add middleware to Livewire's update endpoint.
3. Or resolve the store lazily via a deferred singleton - bind `current_store` as a singleton that resolves from the hostname on first access rather than during middleware execution.

Option 3 (deferred singleton) is the most robust. Register in AppServiceProvider:
```php
$this->app->singleton('current_store', function ($app) {
    // resolve from hostname
    $host = request()->getHost();
    $domain = StoreDomain::where('domain', $host)->first();
    return $domain?->store;
});
```
Then the middleware can still do its 404/503 checks on storefront routes, but the store binding works everywhere.

Search the Livewire docs first to understand the update endpoint middleware. Then implement the best solution.

After fixing, run pint and tests. Message me when done.

Summary: Fix 4 issues including critical Livewire store resolution

QA round 3 found 4 more issues. Issue H is architecturally critical and must be solved properly.


Message sent to dev-backend-p1's inbox

Summary: Fix 4 issues including critical Livewire store resolution

QA round 3 found 4 more issues. Issue H is architecturally critical and must be solved properly.

**Issue E: Seeder missing shop.test store domain**
The storefront middleware resolves store from hostname. `shop.test` (the Herd default domain) is NOT in the seeder. Add a `shop.test` StoreDomain record pointing to Store 1 with type `storefront` in the seeder. This way the app works on both `acme-fashion.test` and `shop.test`.

**Issue F: Admin logout redirects to / instead of /admin/login**
The admin layout's logout button POSTs to Fortify's `/logout` route which redirects to `/`. It should use the custom `/admin/logout` route. Fix the admin layout's logout form action to point to the correct admin logout route.

**Issue G: Customer dashboard 500 - wrong auth guard**
The storefront layout uses `auth()->user()->name` which checks the default `web` guard. Customers use the `customer` guard so `auth()->user()` returns null. Fix: customer pages need their own layout, or the layout needs to check `auth('customer')->user()`. Create a separate storefront layout that uses the customer guard.

**Issue H: CRITICAL - current_store not bound during Livewire update requests**
The `storefront` middleware binds `current_store` on the initial GET, but Livewire action POSTs go to `/livewire/update` which only has `web` middleware. So `app('current_store')` fails during Livewire component actions.

The proper fix is to make store resolution work globally for any request with a storefront hostname. Options:
1. Register `ResolveStore` as a global middleware (applied on every request), not just in the `storefront` group. It should detect storefront domains by hostname and bind the store. For admin routes, it still uses session.
2. Or register it in Livewire's update middleware. Search the Livewire docs for how to add middleware to Livewire's update endpoint.
3. Or resolve the store lazily via a deferred singleton - bind `current_store` as a singleton that resolves from the hostname on first access rather than during middleware execution.

Option 3 (deferred singleton) is the most robust. Register in AppServiceProvider:
```php
$this->app->singleton('current_store', function ($app) {
    // resolve from hostname
    $host = request()->getHost();
    $domain = StoreDomain::where('domain', $host)->first();
    return $domain?->store;
});
```
Then the middleware can still do its 404/503 checks on storefront routes, but the store binding works everywhere.

Search the Livewire docs first to understand the update endpoint middleware. Then implement the best solution.

After fixing, run pint and tests. Message me when done.

Message sent to dev-backend-p1's inbox


Waiting for the developer to fix these issues, especially the critical Livewire store resolution architecture.


<teammate-message teammate_id="dev-backend-p1" color="orange" summary="All 4 QA issues fixed, tests passing">
All 4 issues fixed and verified:

**Issue E - Missing shop.test domain (fixed):**
Added `shop.test` StoreDomain record in `StoreSeeder` pointing to Store 1 with type `storefront`, `is_primary: false`. Both `acme-fashion.test` and `shop.test` now resolve to the same store.

**Issue F - Admin logout redirect (fixed):**
Created `resources/views/layouts/admin.blade.php` - a dedicated admin layout with a header bar and logout form that POSTs to `route('admin.logout')`. Updated `admin/dashboard.blade.php` to use `<x-layouts::admin>` instead of the shared app layout.

**Issue G - Customer dashboard 500 (fixed):**
Created `resources/views/layouts/storefront.blade.php` - a storefront layout that uses `auth('customer')->user()` for the customer guard. Includes login/logout navigation appropriate for customers. Updated `storefront/account/dashboard.blade.php` to use `<x-layouts::storefront>`.

**Issue H - current_store not bound on Livewire updates (fixed):**
Implemented the deferred singleton approach combined with persistent middleware:
- Registered `current_store` as a singleton in `AppServiceProvider::register()` that lazily resolves from hostname via `StoreDomain` lookup (with 5-min cache). This means `app('current_store')` works on any request, including Livewire's `/livewire-{hash}/update` endpoint.
- Added `Livewire::addPersistentMiddleware([ResolveStore::class])` so the middleware's 404/503 checks are re-applied on Livewire update requests.
- Simplified `ResolveStore::resolveFromHostname()` to delegate to the singleton instead of duplicating lookup logic.

**Verification:**
- `vendor/bin/pint --dirty --format agent` - pass
- `php artisan test --compact` - 235 tests, 369 assertions, all passing
- `php artisan migrate:fresh --seed` - all seeders pass, both domains verified
</teammate-message>

<teammate-message teammate_id="dev-backend-p1" color="orange">
{"type":"idle_notification","from":"dev-backend-p1","timestamp":"2026-03-20T07:11:51.687Z","idleReason":"available"}
</teammate-message>


Good architectural fix with the deferred singleton + persistent middleware. Sending QA back for round 3 re-test.


All 4 issues fixed:

1. shop.test domain added to seeder
2. Admin logout now uses correct /admin/logout route with dedicated admin layout
3. Customer dashboard uses new storefront layout with customer guard
4. current_store now resolves via deferred singleton + Livewire persistent middleware - works on all requests including Livewire updates

Run `php artisan migrate:fresh --seed`, then re-test ALL 17 scenarios. Update `work/phase-1/qa-report.md`. Every entry must be PASS for Phase 1 to proceed.

Summary: Re-test all 17 scenarios, round 3

All 4 issues fixed. Re-test all 17 scenarios.


Message sent to qa-analyst-p1's inbox

Summary: Re-test all 17 scenarios, round 3

All 4 issues fixed:

1. shop.test domain added to seeder
2. Admin logout now uses correct /admin/logout route with dedicated admin layout
3. Customer dashboard uses new storefront layout with customer guard
4. current_store now resolves via deferred singleton + Livewire persistent middleware - works on all requests including Livewire updates

Run `php artisan migrate:fresh --seed`, then re-test ALL 17 scenarios. Update `work/phase-1/qa-report.md`. Every entry must be PASS for Phase 1 to proceed.

Message sent to qa-analyst-p1's inbox

Summary: Re-test all 17 scenarios, round 3


More Intelephense false positives - `configureLivewire` is a valid Livewire v4 method, and the "unused" imports are actually used in closures. Waiting for QA round 3 results.


<teammate-message teammate_id="qa-analyst-p1" color="cyan" summary="Phase 1 QA PASS: 17/17 browser tests, 235/235 Pest tests">
Phase 1 QA Round 4: ALL 17 BROWSER TESTS PASS. Report updated at `work/phase-1/qa-report.md`.

**Pest tests:** 235/235 PASS
**Browser tests:** 17/17 PASS

All 12 issues found across 4 rounds have been fixed and verified:
- Admin login, invalid credentials, generic error messages, logout, unauthenticated redirect: all PASS
- Customer login, invalid credentials, registration, duplicate email validation, logout, unauthenticated redirect: all PASS
- Homepage, unknown hostname 404, suspended store 503: all PASS

Phase 1: Foundation is verified and ready to proceed to Phase 2.
</teammate-message>

<teammate-message teammate_id="qa-analyst-p1" color="cyan">
{"type":"idle_notification","from":"qa-analyst-p1","timestamp":"2026-03-20T07:18:31.952Z","idleReason":"available"}
</teammate-message>


All Phase 1 tests pass. Now sending all artifacts to the Controller for final sign-off.


Phase 1 is complete. All artifacts are ready for your final sign-off review. Please read each file and apply the full acceptance criteria (A through F).

**Artifacts to review:**
1. `work/phase-1/gherkin-specs.md` - BDD Gherkin specifications (already approved by you)
2. `work/phase-1/gherkin-review.md` - Gherkin completeness review (already approved by you)
3. `work/phase-1/dev-report.md` - Developer implementation report
4. `work/phase-1/code-review.md` - Code quality review report
5. `work/phase-1/qa-report.md` - QA verification report (17/17 browser tests PASS, 235/235 Pest tests PASS)

**Apply ALL criteria:**

**A. Gherkin Specs** - Already APPROVED. Confirm still valid.

**B. Dev Report:**
- [ ] Exists and explains what was built and how
- [ ] Pest test cases listed and mapped to Gherkin scenarios
- [ ] Deviations documented with reasoning
- [ ] Honest self-assessment identifying weaknesses

**C. Code Review Report:**
- [ ] Quality metrics, thresholds, item-level PASS/FAIL
- [ ] Every item is PASS (no UNKNOWN/SKIPPED/PARTIAL/blank)
- [ ] Static analysis results with actual numbers
- [ ] Self-assessment with quality rating and remaining risks

**D. QA Report:**
- [ ] Entry for every Gherkin scenario
- [ ] Every entry: what tested, how, expected vs actual, PASS/FAIL
- [ ] All entries PASS
- [ ] Asset verification section
- [ ] URL verification section
- [ ] Regression check documented
- [ ] Substantive self-assessment

**E. Completeness & Consistency:**
- [ ] Counts match across chain
- [ ] No requirement unaccounted for

**F. Artifact Quality:**
- [ ] No bare checklists without prose
- [ ] Every artifact has self-assessment
- [ ] Raised risks resolved or accepted

If ALL criteria are MET, produce `work/signoff-phase-1.md` with the filled checklist and narrative assessment. If any criterion is NOT MET, VETO with specifics.

Summary: Review all Phase 1 artifacts for sign-off

Phase 1 is complete. All artifacts are ready for your final sign-off review.


Message sent to controller's inbox

Summary: Review all Phase 1 artifacts for sign-off

Phase 1 is complete. All artifacts are ready for your final sign-off review. Please read each file and apply the full acceptance criteria (A through F).

**Artifacts to review:**
1. `work/phase-1/gherkin-specs.md` - BDD Gherkin specifications (already approved by you)
2. `work/phase-1/gherkin-review.md` - Gherkin completeness review (already approved by you)
3. `work/phase-1/dev-report.md` - Developer implementation report
4. `work/phase-1/code-review.md` - Code quality review report
5. `work/phase-1/qa-report.md` - QA verification report (17/17 browser tests PASS, 235/235 Pest tests PASS)

**Apply ALL criteria:**

**A. Gherkin Specs** - Already APPROVED. Confirm still valid.

**B. Dev Report:**
- [ ] Exists and explains what was built and how
- [ ] Pest test cases listed and mapped to Gherkin scenarios
- [ ] Deviations documented with reasoning
- [ ] Honest self-assessment identifying weaknesses

**C. Code Review Report:**
- [ ] Quality metrics, thresholds, item-level PASS/FAIL
- [ ] Every item is PASS (no UNKNOWN/SKIPPED/PARTIAL/blank)
- [ ] Static analysis results with actual numbers
- [ ] Self-assessment with quality rating and remaining risks

**D. QA Report:**
- [ ] Entry for every Gherkin scenario
- [ ] Every entry: what tested, how, expected vs actual, PASS/FAIL
- [ ] All entries PASS
- [ ] Asset verification section
- [ ] URL verification section
- [ ] Regression check documented
- [ ] Substantive self-assessment

**E. Completeness & Consistency:**
- [ ] Counts match across chain
- [ ] No requirement unaccounted for

**F. Artifact Quality:**
- [ ] No bare checklists without prose
- [ ] Every artifact has self-assessment
- [ ] Raised risks resolved or accepted

If ALL criteria are MET, produce `work/signoff-phase-1.md` with the filled checklist and narrative assessment. If any criterion is NOT MET, VETO with specifics.

Message sent to controller's inbox


Waiting for the Controller's Phase 1 sign-off decision.


<teammate-message teammate_id="controller" color="blue" summary="APPROVE verdict for Phase 1 full sign-off">
## Phase 1 Final Sign-Off Review -- Controller Assessment

I have read all five artifacts in full. Below is my evaluation against criteria A through F.

---

### A. Gherkin Specs -- PASS (previously approved, reconfirmed)

Both `gherkin-specs.md` (1569 lines) and `gherkin-review.md` (272 lines) exist. 97 requirements mapped to 143 scenarios. Traceability table complete. Self-assessments substantive. No change since prior approval.

---

### B. Dev Report -- PASS

**Exists and explains what was built:** Yes. Lines 1-78 walk through each step (1.1-1.8) with specific file names, architectural decisions, and implementation details. This is prose, not just a checklist.

**Pest test cases listed and mapped to Gherkin scenarios:** Yes. Lines 79-175 list 14 test files totaling 235 tests with 369 assertions. Each test file section names the Gherkin feature it maps to (e.g., "Maps to Gherkin: Environment and Configuration (Step 1.1)"). Individual test descriptions are provided.

**Deviations documented with reasoning:** Yes. Lines 177-191 document 7 deviations, each with an explanation:
1. store_users has only created_at (per schema spec)
2. Customer model created early (auth guard dependency)
3. Password column naming (Laravel compatibility)
4. CHECK constraints handled via PHP enums instead (application-layer validation)
5. Config tests read .env directly (phpunit.xml overrides)
6. Admin password reset deferred (Fortify handles it)
7. Fortify login rate limiter coexistence

**Honest self-assessment identifying weaknesses:** Yes. Lines 193-200 list 3 known limitations: BelongsToStore only on Customer, minimal views, Fortify view integration conflict.

---

### C. Code Review Report -- PASS

**Quality metrics, thresholds, item-level PASS/FAIL:** Yes. Lines 1-16 define 10 criteria with thresholds and measurement methods. Lines 40-146 evaluate each with an explicit PASS verdict.

**Every item is PASS:** Yes. All 10 items (Code Style, Type Safety, Eloquent Best Practices, Security, SOLID, PHP 8 Features, Test Quality, Laravel Conventions, Code Duplication, Error Handling) are marked PASS. No UNKNOWN, SKIPPED, PARTIAL, or blank entries.

**Static analysis results with actual numbers:** Yes. Lines 20-35:
- Pint: 0 violations in Phase 1 files (10 in pre-existing Fortify files, correctly scoped out)
- Test suite: 235 tests, 369 assertions, 5.84s, no skipped/incomplete
- env() outside config: 0
- DB:: facade: 1 occurrence (appropriate use)
- Raw SQL: 0

**Self-assessment with quality rating and remaining risks:** Yes. Lines 167-186:
- Rating: 8/10 with specific deductions (-0.5 each for trait location inconsistency, rate limiter key collision, repeated queries, no request-scoped caching)
- Remaining risks: Fortify route coexistence, policy auto-discovery for future models
- "Passes but feels fragile" section on StoreSeeder execution order and orphaned password reset tokens

5 observations (lines 149-164) are noted as non-issues but worth tracking. This is good practice -- the reviewer flags things without inflating them into failures.

---

### D. QA Report -- ASSESSMENT BELOW

**Entry for every Gherkin scenario:** PARTIAL. The QA report covers 17 browser test entries across admin auth (6), customer auth (8), and storefront (3). It also references the 235 Pest tests passing for backend-only scenarios (Section 6, lines 197-208). However, the QA report does NOT have individual entries for every Gherkin scenario. The Gherkin specs define 143 scenarios. The QA report covers:
- 17 browser test entries with full what/how/expected/actual/status
- A blanket "235 Pest tests pass" reference for everything else

The backend scenarios (config verification, migration schema, model relationships, enum cases, role checking trait, all 10 policies, all 8 gates, CheckStoreRole middleware, ownership constraints) are verified by Pest tests but do not appear as individual QA entries with what/how/expected/actual.

**This is a judgment call.** The criteria say "Entry for every Gherkin scenario." Strictly interpreted, that means 143 entries. The QA report has 17 detailed entries + a bulk Pest reference. However, the Gherkin scenarios for config verification, enum correctness, model relationships, and policy authorization are inherently non-browser testable. The QA tester verified them by confirming all 235 Pest tests pass. I will accept this with a note (see below).

**Every entry: what tested, how, expected vs actual, PASS/FAIL:** Yes, for all 17 browser entries. Each has all four fields plus history of fixes across rounds. The Pest reference entries (5.2, 5.3) note "verified via Pest" as their method, which is honest.

**All entries PASS:** Yes. 17/17 browser tests PASS. 235/235 Pest tests PASS.

**Asset verification section:** Yes. Lines 212-223, 6 pages checked, all PASS. Format: Page URL, Assets Found, Loaded, Status.

**URL verification section:** Yes. Lines 227-240, 8 URLs checked, all PASS. Format: URL, Expected, Actual, Status.

**Regression check documented:** Yes. Line 246: "No prior phases to regress against." Correct for Phase 1.

**Substantive self-assessment:** Yes. Lines 290-299 cover testing methodology notes (Playwright/Flux interaction quirks, hostname resolution tested via Pest), and areas for future phases to watch (Livewire persistent middleware, storefront layouts).

---

### E. Completeness and Consistency -- PASS

**Counts match across chain:**
- Gherkin: 97 requirements, 143 scenarios
- Dev report: 235 tests mapped to Gherkin features covering Steps 1.1-1.8
- Code review: 235 tests, 369 assertions confirmed
- QA report: 235 Pest tests + 17 browser tests, all passing

The 235 Pest tests exceed the 143 Gherkin scenario count (which is the minimum bar per criterion E). Many Scenario Outlines expand to multiple Pest test cases via datasets.

**No requirement unaccounted for:** The traceability table maps all 97 requirements. The dev report covers all 8 steps. The code review evaluates all Phase 1 files. The QA report confirms all tests pass.

---

### F. Artifact Quality -- PASS

**No bare checklists without prose:** All artifacts include narrative explanations alongside any tables or checklists. The code review's item-level evaluations each contain 3-10 lines of prose. The dev report explains each step in sentences, not just bullet points.

**Every artifact has self-assessment:** Yes.
- gherkin-specs.md: 10 ambiguities section (lines 1542-1568)
- gherkin-review.md: Confidence level, strengths, weaknesses, edge cases (lines 236-266)
- dev-report.md: Known limitations and technical debt (lines 193-200)
- code-review.md: Quality rating 8/10 with deductions and remaining risks (lines 167-186)
- qa-report.md: Testing notes and future areas to watch (lines 290-299)

**Raised risks resolved or accepted:** Yes.
- Code review's 5 observations are explicitly flagged as "not issues" but tracked
- Dev report's 3 known limitations are documented with reasoning for deferral
- QA report's Playwright quirks are explained as tool limitations, not app bugs
- Fortify route coexistence is acknowledged as future technical debt

---

### Noted Concern (Not a Veto)

The QA report covers 17 browser scenarios in detail but does not provide individual entries for all 143 Gherkin scenarios. The remaining ~126 scenarios are covered by the "235 Pest tests pass" blanket statement. For backend-only scenarios (config, schema, models, enums, policies, gates), this is reasonable -- a QA analyst cannot meaningfully browser-test whether `StoreStatus` is a backed string enum. The Pest tests are the correct verification mechanism for those.

I am accepting this because:
1. All 17 scenarios that CAN be browser-tested have detailed entries
2. All 235 Pest tests pass, covering the remaining scenarios
3. The dev report maps Pest test files to Gherkin features, closing the traceability chain
4. Requiring 143 individual QA entries for inherently non-visual scenarios would produce empty busywork

However, for future phases with more browser-testable features (storefront pages, cart, checkout), the QA report should have individual entries for each browser-verifiable scenario, not just the happy paths.

---

## VERDICT: APPROVE

All criteria A through F are met. I will produce the sign-off file now.
</teammate-message>

<teammate-message teammate_id="controller" color="blue" summary="Phase 1 sign-off file created, APPROVED">
Sign-off file produced at `work/signoff-phase-1.md`. Phase 1 is APPROVED. All criteria A through F are met. Four accepted risks are documented in the sign-off file. Ready for Phase 2.
</teammate-message>

<teammate-message teammate_id="controller" color="blue">
{"type":"idle_notification","from":"controller","timestamp":"2026-03-20T07:21:03.055Z","idleReason":"available"}
</teammate-message>


Phase 1 is APPROVED. Let me update progress, commit, shut down Phase 1 teammates, and prepare for Phase 2.


Updated task #1 status


Phase 1 approved by Controller. Your work is complete. Thank you.

Phase 1 approved by Controller. Your work is complete. Thank you.


Shutdown request sent to dev-backend-p1. Request ID: shutdown-1773991271224@dev-backend-p1


Phase 1 approved by Controller. QA verification complete. Thank you.

Phase 1 approved by Controller. QA verification complete. Thank you.


Shutdown request sent to qa-analyst-p1. Request ID: shutdown-1773991271687@qa-analyst-p1


Edit

| 1 | Foundation (Migrations, Models, Middleware, Auth) | NOT STARTED | - | - |

| 1 | Foundation (Migrations, Models, Middleware, Auth) | COMPLETE | 2026-03-20 | 2026-03-20 |


The file /Users/fabianwesner/Herd/shop/work/progress.md has been updated successfully.

# Project Progress

## Overview
Self-contained e-commerce platform with multi-tenant support, 12 implementation phases.

## Phases

| Phase | Name | Status | Started | Completed |
|-------|------|--------|---------|-----------|
| 1 | Foundation (Migrations, Models, Middleware, Auth) | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 2 | Catalog (Products, Variants, Inventory, Collections, Media) | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 3 | Themes, Pages, Navigation, Storefront Layout | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 4 | Cart, Checkout, Discounts, Shipping, Taxes | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 5 | Payments, Orders, Fulfillment | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 6 | Customer Accounts | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 7 | Admin Panel | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 8 | Search | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 9 | Analytics | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 10 | Apps and Webhooks | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 11 | Polish | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 12 | Full Test Suite Execution | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| - | Final E2E QA (143 test cases) | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| - | Adversarial QA | NOT STARTED | - | - |

## Current Phase
None - project plan pending Controller approval.

-| 1 | Foundation (Migrations, Models, Middleware, Auth) | NOT STARTED | - | - |

+| 1 | Foundation (Migrations, Models, Middleware, Auth) | COMPLETE | 2026-03-20 | 2026-03-20 |


## Current Phase
None - project plan pending Controller approval.

## Current Phase
Phase 2: Catalog (Products, Variants, Inventory, Collections, Media)


## Current Phase
Phase 2: Catalog (Products, Variants, Inventory, Collections, Media)

# Project Progress

## Overview
Self-contained e-commerce platform with multi-tenant support, 12 implementation phases.

## Phases

| Phase | Name | Status | Started | Completed |
|-------|------|--------|---------|-----------|
| 1 | Foundation (Migrations, Models, Middleware, Auth) | COMPLETE | 2026-03-20 | 2026-03-20 |
| 2 | Catalog (Products, Variants, Inventory, Collections, Media) | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 3 | Themes, Pages, Navigation, Storefront Layout | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 4 | Cart, Checkout, Discounts, Shipping, Taxes | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 5 | Payments, Orders, Fulfillment | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 6 | Customer Accounts | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 7 | Admin Panel | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 8 | Search | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 9 | Analytics | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 10 | Apps and Webhooks | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 11 | Polish | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| 12 | Full Test Suite Execution | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| - | Final E2E QA (143 test cases) | NOT STARTED | - | - |
| - | Adversarial QA | NOT STARTED | - | - |

## Current Phase
None - project plan pending Controller approval.

-None - project plan pending Controller approval.

+Phase 2: Catalog (Products, Variants, Inventory, Collections, Media)


Now let me commit Phase 1 and start Phase 2.


Bash

Stage all Phase 1 changes and check status


On branch 2026-03-18-claude-code-team
Your branch and 'origin/2026-03-18-claude-code-team' have diverged,
and have 1 and 13 different commits each, respectively.
  (use "git pull" if you want to integrate the remote branch with yours)

Changes to be committed:
  (use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
	new file:   .playwright-mcp/console-2026-03-20T06-45-30-226Z.log
	new file:   .playwright-mcp/console-2026-03-20T06-45-41-825Z.log
	new file:   .playwright-mcp/console-2026-03-20T06-46-33-469Z.log
	new file:   .playwright-mcp/console-2026-03-20T06-46-48-583Z.log
	new file:   .playwright-mcp/console-2026-03-20T06-53-31-639Z.log
	new file:   .playwright-mcp/console-2026-03-20T06-54-27-525Z.log
	new file:   .playwright-mcp/console-2026-03-20T06-54-39-172Z.log
	new file:   .playwright-mcp/console-2026-03-20T06-54-54-805Z.log
	new file:   .playwright-mcp/console-2026-03-20T06-55-26-748Z.log
	new file:   .playwright-mcp/console-2026-03-20T06-55-44-566Z.log
	new file:   .playwright-mcp/console-2026-03-20T06-56-15-357Z.log
	new file:   .playwright-mcp/console-2026-03-20T07-02-19-020Z.log
	new file:   .playwright-mcp/console-2026-03-20T07-03-45-703Z.log
	new file:   .playwright-mcp/console-2026-03-20T07-04-20-516Z.log
	new file:   .playwright-mcp/console-2026-03-20T07-04-40-789Z.log
	new file:   account-dashboard.png
	new file:   app/Auth/CustomerUserProvider.php
	new file:   app/Enums/StoreDomainType.php
	new file:   app/Enums/StoreStatus.php
	new file:   app/Enums/StoreUserRole.php
	new file:   app/Http/Middleware/CheckStoreRole.php
	new file:   app/Http/Middleware/CustomerAuthenticate.php
	new file:   app/Http/Middleware/ResolveStore.php
	new file:   app/Livewire/Admin/Auth/Login.php
	new file:   app/Livewire/Admin/Auth/Logout.php
	new file:   app/Livewire/Storefront/Account/Auth/Login.php
	new file:   app/Livewire/Storefront/Account/Auth/Register.php
	new file:   app/Models/Concerns/BelongsToStore.php
	new file:   app/Models/Customer.php
	new file:   app/Models/Organization.php
	new file:   app/Models/Scopes/StoreScope.php
	new file:   app/Models/Store.php
	new file:   app/Models/StoreDomain.php
	new file:   app/Models/StoreSettings.php
	new file:   app/Models/StoreUser.php
	modified:   app/Models/User.php
	new file:   app/Policies/CollectionPolicy.php
	new file:   app/Policies/CustomerPolicy.php
	new file:   app/Policies/DiscountPolicy.php
	new file:   app/Policies/FulfillmentPolicy.php
	new file:   app/Policies/NavigationMenuPolicy.php
	new file:   app/Policies/OrderPolicy.php
	new file:   app/Policies/PagePolicy.php
	new file:   app/Policies/ProductPolicy.php
	new file:   app/Policies/RefundPolicy.php
	new file:   app/Policies/StorePolicy.php
	new file:   app/Policies/ThemePolicy.php
	modified:   app/Providers/AppServiceProvider.php
	new file:   app/Traits/ChecksStoreRole.php
	modified:   bootstrap/app.php
	modified:   config/auth.php
	modified:   config/database.php
	modified:   config/logging.php
	new file:   database/factories/CustomerFactory.php
	new file:   database/factories/OrganizationFactory.php
	new file:   database/factories/StoreDomainFactory.php
	new file:   database/factories/StoreFactory.php
	new file:   database/factories/StoreSettingsFactory.php
	modified:   database/factories/UserFactory.php
	new file:   database/migrations/2026_03_20_062606_create_organizations_table.php
	new file:   database/migrations/2026_03_20_062611_add_status_and_login_columns_to_users_table.php
	new file:   database/migrations/2026_03_20_062611_create_stores_table.php
	new file:   database/migrations/2026_03_20_062612_create_customer_password_reset_tokens_table.php
	new file:   database/migrations/2026_03_20_062612_create_store_settings_table.php
	new file:   database/migrations/2026_03_20_062612_create_store_users_table.php
	new file:   database/migrations/2026_03_20_062613_create_store_domains_table.php
	new file:   database/migrations/2026_03_20_062913_create_customers_table.php
	new file:   database/seeders/CustomerSeeder.php
	modified:   database/seeders/DatabaseSeeder.php
	new file:   database/seeders/OrganizationSeeder.php
	new file:   database/seeders/StoreSeeder.php
	new file:   resources/views/admin/dashboard.blade.php
	new file:   resources/views/layouts/admin.blade.php
	new file:   resources/views/layouts/guest.blade.php
	new file:   resources/views/layouts/storefront.blade.php
	new file:   resources/views/livewire/admin/auth/login.blade.php
	new file:   resources/views/livewire/admin/auth/logout.blade.php
	new file:   resources/views/livewire/storefront/account/auth/login.blade.php
	new file:   resources/views/livewire/storefront/account/auth/register.blade.php
	new file:   resources/views/storefront/account/dashboard.blade.php
	modified:   routes/web.php
	new file:   tests/Feature/Auth/AdminAuthTest.php
	new file:   tests/Feature/Auth/CustomerAuthTest.php
	new file:   tests/Feature/Authorization/GatesTest.php
	new file:   tests/Feature/Authorization/PolicyTest.php
	new file:   tests/Feature/Authorization/RoleCheckingTest.php
	new file:   tests/Feature/Config/EnvironmentConfigTest.php
	new file:   tests/Feature/Models/MigrationSchemaTest.php
	new file:   tests/Feature/Models/OrganizationTest.php
	new file:   tests/Feature/Models/StoreDomainTest.php
	new file:   tests/Feature/Models/StoreSettingsTest.php
	new file:   tests/Feature/Models/StoreTest.php
	new file:   tests/Feature/Models/StoreUserTest.php
	new file:   tests/Feature/Models/UserTest.php
	new file:   tests/Feature/Tenancy/StoreIsolationTest.php
	new file:   tests/Feature/Tenancy/TenantResolutionTest.php
	modified:   tests/Pest.php
	new file:   tests/Unit/Enums/EnumTest.php
	new file:   work/phase-1/code-review.md
	new file:   work/phase-1/dev-report.md
	new file:   work/phase-1/gherkin-review.md
	new file:   work/phase-1/gherkin-specs.md
	new file:   work/phase-1/qa-report.md
	new file:   work/progress.md
	new file:   work/signoff-phase-1.md


Let me unstage the Playwright logs and screenshots, then commit.


git reset HEAD .playwright-mcp/ account-dashboard.png 2>/dev/null; echo "---"; echo ".playwright-mcp/" >> /Users/fabianwesner/Herd/shop/.gitignore; echo "*.png" >> /Users/fabianwesner/Herd/shop/.gitignore

Unstage Playwright logs and add to gitignore


git add -A && git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
Phase 1: Foundation - migrations, models, middleware, auth, authorization

Implements the complete foundation layer:
- Environment config (SQLite WAL, file cache/session, customer auth guard)
- 8 migrations (organizations, stores, store_domains, users, store_users, store_settings, customers, customer_password_reset_tokens)
- Core models with relationships, factories, and seeders
- Enums (StoreStatus, StoreUserRole, StoreDomainType)
- Tenant resolution middleware with deferred singleton + Livewire persistent middleware
- BelongsToStore trait and StoreScope for automatic tenant isolation
- Admin auth (Livewire login/logout, rate limiting)
- Customer auth (custom guard, CustomerUserProvider, store-scoped login/register)
- 11 authorization policies + 8 gates with role-based permission matrix
- 235 Pest tests (369 assertions), all passing

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
EOF
)"

Commit Phase 1 with descriptive message


[2026-03-18-claude-code-team 941bafb6] Phase 1: Foundation - migrations, models, middleware, auth, authorization
 90 files changed, 6056 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 app/Auth/CustomerUserProvider.php
 create mode 100644 app/Enums/StoreDomainType.php
 create mode 100644 app/Enums/StoreStatus.php
 create mode 100644 app/Enums/StoreUserRole.php
 create mode 100644 app/Http/Middleware/CheckStoreRole.php
 create mode 100644 app/Http/Middleware/CustomerAuthenticate.php
 create mode 100644 app/Http/Middleware/ResolveStore.php
 create mode 100644 app/Livewire/Admin/Auth/Login.php
 create mode 100644 app/Livewire/Admin/Auth/Logout.php
 create mode 100644 app/Livewire/Storefront/Account/Auth/Login.php
 create mode 100644 app/Livewire/Storefront/Account/Auth/Register.php
 create mode 100644 app/Models/Concerns/BelongsToStore.php
 create mode 100644 app/Models/Customer.php
 create mode 100644 app/Models/Organization.php
 create mode 100644 app/Models/Scopes/StoreScope.php
 create mode 100644 app/Models/Store.php
 create mode 100644 app/Models/StoreDomain.php
 create mode 100644 app/Models/StoreSettings.php
 create mode 100644 app/Models/StoreUser.php
 create mode 100644 app/Policies/CollectionPolicy.php
 create mode 100644 app/Policies/CustomerPolicy.php
 create mode 100644 app/Policies/DiscountPolicy.php
 create mode 100644 app/Policies/FulfillmentPolicy.php
 create mode 100644 app/Policies/NavigationMenuPolicy.php
 create mode 100644 app/Policies/OrderPolicy.php
 create mode 100644 app/Policies/PagePolicy.php
 create mode 100644 app/Policies/ProductPolicy.php
 create mode 100644 app/Policies/RefundPolicy.php
 create mode 100644 app/Policies/StorePolicy.php
 create mode 100644 app/Policies/ThemePolicy.php
 create mode 100644 app/Traits/ChecksStoreRole.php
 create mode 100644 database/factories/CustomerFactory.php
 create mode 100644 database/factories/OrganizationFactory.php
 create mode 100644 database/factories/StoreDomainFactory.php
 create mode 100644 database/factories/StoreFactory.php
 create mode 100644 database/factories/StoreSettingsFactory.php
 create mode 100644 database/migrations/2026_03_20_062606_create_organizations_table.php
 create mode 100644 database/migrations/2026_03_20_062611_add_status_and_login_columns_to_users_table.php
 create mode 100644 database/migrations/2026_03_20_062611_create_stores_table.php
 create mode 100644 database/migrations/2026_03_20_062612_create_customer_password_reset_tokens_table.php
 create mode 100644 database/migrations/2026_03_20_062612_create_store_settings_table.php
 create mode 100644 database/migrations/2026_03_20_062612_create_store_users_table.php
 create mode 100644 database/migrations/2026_03_20_062613_create_store_domains_table.php
 create mode 100644 database/migrations/2026_03_20_062913_create_customers_table.php
 create mode 100644 database/seeders/CustomerSeeder.php
 create mode 100644 database/seeders/OrganizationSeeder.php
 create mode 100644 database/seeders/StoreSeeder.php
 create mode 100644 resources/views/admin/dashboard.blade.php
 create mode 100644 resources/views/layouts/admin.blade.php
 create mode 100644 resources/views/layouts/guest.blade.php
 create mode 100644 resources/views/layouts/storefront.blade.php
 create mode 100644 resources/views/livewire/admin/auth/login.blade.php
 create mode 100644 resources/views/livewire/admin/auth/logout.blade.php
 create mode 100644 resources/views/livewire/storefront/account/auth/login.blade.php
 create mode 100644 resources/views/livewire/storefront/account/auth/register.blade.php
 create mode 100644 resources/views/storefront/account/dashboard.blade.php
 create mode 100644 tests/Feature/Auth/AdminAuthTest.php
 create mode 100644 tests/Feature/Auth/CustomerAuthTest.php
 create mode 100644 tests/Feature/Authorization/GatesTest.php
 create mode 100644 tests/Feature/Authorization/PolicyTest.php
 create mode 100644 tests/Feature/Authorization/RoleCheckingTest.php
 create mode 100644 tests/Feature/Config/EnvironmentConfigTest.php
 create mode 100644 tests/Feature/Models/MigrationSchemaTest.php
 create mode 100644 tests/Feature/Models/OrganizationTest.php
 create mode 100644 tests/Feature/Models/StoreDomainTest.php
 create mode 100644 tests/Feature/Models/StoreSettingsTest.php
 create mode 100644 tests/Feature/Models/StoreTest.php
 create mode 100644 tests/Feature/Models/StoreUserTest.php
 create mode 100644 tests/Feature/Models/UserTest.php
 create mode 100644 tests/Feature/Tenancy/StoreIsolationTest.php
 create mode 100644 tests/Feature/Tenancy/TenantResolutionTest.php
 create mode 100644 tests/Unit/Enums/EnumTest.php
 create mode 100644 work/phase-1/code-review.md
 create mode 100644 work/phase-1/dev-report.md
 create mode 100644 work/phase-1/gherkin-review.md
 create mode 100644 work/phase-1/gherkin-specs.md
 create mode 100644 work/phase-1/qa-report.md
 create mode 100644 work/progress.md
 create mode 100644 work/signoff-phase-1.md


Phase 1 committed. Now let me start Phase 2: Catalog. I'll spawn the BDD Expert first.


Updated task #2 owner, status


Agent

Phase 2 BDD Expert

Prompt:
You are the **BDD Expert** for Phase 2: Catalog (Products, Variants, Inventory, Collections, Media) of the shop project.

## Your Task
Read the Phase 2 requirements from `specs/09-IMPLEMENTATION-ROADMAP.md` (Steps 2.1 through 2.5, starting around line 245) and rewrite them as Gherkin specifications. Save your output to `work/phase-2/gherkin-specs.md`.

## Phase 2 Scope (from the roadmap)
- Step 2.1: Migrations for products, product_options, product_option_values, product_variants, variant_option_values, inventory_items, collections, collection_products, product_media
- Step 2.2: Models with relationships (Product, ProductOption, ProductOptionValue, ProductVariant, InventoryItem, Collection, ProductMedia) + Enums (ProductStatus, VariantStatus, CollectionStatus, MediaType, MediaStatus, InventoryPolicy)
- Step 2.3: Product Service (create, update, transitionStatus, delete), VariantMatrixService (rebuildMatrix), HandleGenerator (generate unique slugs)
- Step 2.4: Inventory Service (checkAvailability, reserve, release, commit, restock) with transaction wrapping and InsufficientInventoryException
- Step 2.5: Media Upload (ProcessMediaUpload job, Livewire file upload, image resizing)

Also reference:
- `specs/01-DATABASE-SCHEMA.md` for schema details
- `specs/05-BUSINESS-LOGIC.md` for business logic details
- The Pest test specification in `specs/09-IMPLEMENTATION-ROADMAP.md` Section 3 (tests/Feature/Products/ and tests/Unit/) for test case details

## Output Format for `work/phase-2/gherkin-specs.md`

The file must contain:
1. A clear list of every acceptance criterion from the phase spec
2. Each criterion mapped to one or more Gherkin scenarios
3. A traceability table: spec requirement -> Gherkin scenario name
4. A self-assessment section

## Rules
- Create `work/phase-2/` directory if needed
- Cover EVERY requirement including edge cases
- Be specific in Given/When/Then steps
- Include all enum values, all relationship definitions, all service methods
- Reference the Pest test spec for test case names and assertions
- Never use em-dash characters

When done, send a message to the team lead.


Spawned successfully.
agent_id: bdd-expert-p2@vivid-launching-llama
name: bdd-expert-p2
team_name: vivid-launching-llama
The agent is now running and will receive instructions via mailbox.

Prompt:
You are the **BDD Expert** for Phase 2: Catalog (Products, Variants, Inventory, Collections, Media) of the shop project.

## Your Task
Read the Phase 2 requirements from `specs/09-IMPLEMENTATION-ROADMAP.md` (Steps 2.1 through 2.5, starting around line 245) and rewrite them as Gherkin specifications. Save your output to `work/phase-2/gherkin-specs.md`.

## Phase 2 Scope (from the roadmap)
- Step 2.1: Migrations for products, product_options, product_option_values, product_variants, variant_option_values, inventory_items, collections, collection_products, product_media
- Step 2.2: Models with relationships (Product, ProductOption, ProductOptionValue, ProductVariant, InventoryItem, Collection, ProductMedia) + Enums (ProductStatus, VariantStatus, CollectionStatus, MediaType, MediaStatus, InventoryPolicy)
- Step 2.3: Product Service (create, update, transitionStatus, delete), VariantMatrixService (rebuildMatrix), HandleGenerator (generate unique slugs)
- Step 2.4: Inventory Service (checkAvailability, reserve, release, commit, restock) with transaction wrapping and InsufficientInventoryException
- Step 2.5: Media Upload (ProcessMediaUpload job, Livewire file upload, image resizing)

Also reference:
- `specs/01-DATABASE-SCHEMA.md` for schema details
- `specs/05-BUSINESS-LOGIC.md` for business logic details
- The Pest test specification in `specs/09-IMPLEMENTATION-ROADMAP.md` Section 3 (tests/Feature/Products/ and tests/Unit/) for test case details

## Output Format for `work/phase-2/gherkin-specs.md`

The file must contain:
1. A clear list of every acceptance criterion from the phase spec
2. Each criterion mapped to one or more Gherkin scenarios
3. A traceability table: spec requirement -> Gherkin scenario name
4. A self-assessment section

## Rules
- Create `work/phase-2/` directory if needed
- Cover EVERY requirement including edge cases
- Be specific in Given/When/Then steps
- Include all enum values, all relationship definitions, all service methods
- Reference the Pest test spec for test case names and assertions
- Never use em-dash characters

When done, send a message to the team lead.


**Phase 1: COMPLETE** - 235 tests, 17/17 browser tests, Controller approved, committed.
**Phase 2: STARTED** - BDD Expert writing Gherkin specs for Catalog phase.


<teammate-message teammate_id="system">
{"type":"teammate_terminated","message":"dev-backend-p1 has shut down."}
</teammate-message>

<teammate-message teammate_id="dev-backend-p1" color="orange">
{"type":"shutdown_approved","requestId":"shutdown-1773991271224@dev-backend-p1","from":"dev-backend-p1","timestamp":"2026-03-20T07:21:20.021Z","paneId":"in-process","backendType":"in-process"}
</teammate-message>

<teammate-message teammate_id="system">
{"type":"teammate_terminated","message":"qa-analyst-p1 has shut down."}
</teammate-message>

<teammate-message teammate_id="qa-analyst-p1" color="cyan">
{"type":"shutdown_approved","requestId":"shutdown-1773991271687@qa-analyst-p1","from":"qa-analyst-p1","timestamp":"2026-03-20T07:21:21.455Z","paneId":"in-process","backendType":"in-process"}
</teammate-message>

<teammate-message teammate_id="team-lead">
{"type":"task_assignment","taskId":"2","subject":"Phase 2: Catalog (Products, Variants, Inventory, Collections, Media)","description":"Implement Phase 2: Product/Variant/Collection/Media models, migrations, services (ProductService, VariantMatrixService, InventoryService, HandleGenerator), media upload processing. Depends on Phase 1.","assignedBy":"team-lead","timestamp":"2026-03-20T07:21:49.077Z"}
</teammate-message>


Phase 1 teammates cleanly shut down. BDD Expert for Phase 2 is working on Gherkin specs. Waiting for completion.


<teammate-message teammate_id="bdd-expert-p2" color="red" summary="Phase 2 Gherkin specs complete with full coverage">
Phase 2 BDD Gherkin specs are complete and saved to `work/phase-2/gherkin-specs.md`.

**Summary of coverage:**

- **Step 2.1 (Migrations):** All 9 tables covered -- products, product_options, product_option_values, product_variants, variant_option_values, inventory_items, collections, collection_products, product_media. Every column, FK, index, and check constraint has a scenario.

- **Step 2.2 (Models/Relationships/Enums):** All 7 models with their exact relationship definitions. All 6 enums (ProductStatus, VariantStatus, CollectionStatus, MediaType, MediaStatus, InventoryPolicy) with every case value.

- **Step 2.3 (Product Service):** ProductService (create, update, transitionStatus, delete) with full state machine coverage (all valid transitions + blocked transitions + edge cases like published_at preservation). VariantMatrixService (rebuildMatrix) with 7 scenarios including 3-way cartesian products. HandleGenerator with all 6 Pest test cases mapped. SKU uniqueness with 4 scenarios.

- **Step 2.4 (Inventory Service):** All 5 methods (checkAvailability, reserve, release, commit, restock) covered. InsufficientInventoryException for deny policy, overselling for continue policy, transaction wrapping verified. Auto-creation of inventory items on variant creation.

- **Step 2.5 (Media Upload):** Livewire file upload (5 scenarios) and ProcessMediaUpload job (3 scenarios) covering image resizing to 3 sizes (150x150, 600x600, 1200x1200), failure handling, and metadata updates.

- **Pest test alignment:** All 48 test cases from the roadmap spec (HandleGeneratorTest: 6, ProductCrudTest: 13, VariantTest: 8, InventoryTest: 8, CollectionTest: 7, MediaUploadTest: 6) are mapped to Gherkin scenarios.

- **Traceability table** maps every spec requirement to its Gherkin scenario names.
- **Self-assessment** section documents coverage completeness and notes any gaps.
</teammate-message>

<teammate-message teammate_id="bdd-expert-p2" color="red">
{"type":"idle_notification","from":"bdd-expert-p2","timestamp":"2026-03-20T07:26:00.385Z","idleReason":"available"}
</teammate-message>


Phase 2 Gherkin specs complete. Let me spawn the Gherkin Reviewer to validate.


Phase 2 Gherkin Reviewer

Prompt:
You are the **Gherkin Reviewer** for Phase 2: Catalog of the shop project.

## Your Task
Review the Gherkin specifications in `work/phase-2/gherkin-specs.md` and confirm they are 100% complete vs. the Phase 2 spec. Save your review to `work/phase-2/gherkin-review.md`.

## What You Must Do

1. **Read the source specs:**
   - `specs/09-IMPLEMENTATION-ROADMAP.md` (Steps 2.1 through 2.5, starting around line 245 through line 346)
   - `specs/01-DATABASE-SCHEMA.md` for schema details
   - `specs/05-BUSINESS-LOGIC.md` for business logic details
   - The Pest test spec in `specs/09-IMPLEMENTATION-ROADMAP.md` Section 3 (tests for Products, Variants, Inventory, Collections, MediaUpload, HandleGenerator, CartVersion)

2. **Read the Gherkin specs:** `work/phase-2/gherkin-specs.md`

3. **Verify completeness:**
   - Count every discrete requirement in the phase spec
   - Count every Gherkin scenario
   - Confirm every requirement has a corresponding scenario
   - Flag any gaps
   - Check consistency with Phase 1 (already done) and Phase 3/4 (what comes next)

4. **Write your review to `work/phase-2/gherkin-review.md`** containing:
   - Written confirmation with exact count: "X requirements identified, Y Gherkin scenarios written"
   - Any gaps found
   - Consistency with adjacent phases
   - Self-assessment: confidence level, what could be missing

## Rules
- Be thorough
- Exact counts, not approximate
- Never use em-dash characters

When done, send a message to the team lead.


Spawned successfully.
agent_id: gherkin-reviewer-p2@vivid-launching-llama
name: gherkin-reviewer-p2
team_name: vivid-launching-llama
The agent is now running and will receive instructions via mailbox.

Prompt:
You are the **Gherkin Reviewer** for Phase 2: Catalog of the shop project.

## Your Task
Review the Gherkin specifications in `work/phase-2/gherkin-specs.md` and confirm they are 100% complete vs. the Phase 2 spec. Save your review to `work/phase-2/gherkin-review.md`.

## What You Must Do

1. **Read the source specs:**
   - `specs/09-IMPLEMENTATION-ROADMAP.md` (Steps 2.1 through 2.5, starting around line 245 through line 346)
   - `specs/01-DATABASE-SCHEMA.md` for schema details
   - `specs/05-BUSINESS-LOGIC.md` for business logic details
   - The Pest test spec in `specs/09-IMPLEMENTATION-ROADMAP.md` Section 3 (tests for Products, Variants, Inventory, Collections, MediaUpload, HandleGenerator, CartVersion)

2. **Read the Gherkin specs:** `work/phase-2/gherkin-specs.md`

3. **Verify completeness:**
   - Count every discrete requirement in the phase spec
   - Count every Gherkin scenario
   - Confirm every requirement has a corresponding scenario
   - Flag any gaps
   - Check consistency with Phase 1 (already done) and Phase 3/4 (what comes next)

4. **Write your review to `work/phase-2/gherkin-review.md`** containing:
   - Written confirmation with exact count: "X requirements identified, Y Gherkin scenarios written"
   - Any gaps found
   - Consistency with adjacent phases
   - Self-assessment: confidence level, what could be missing

## Rules
- Be thorough
- Exact counts, not approximate
- Never use em-dash characters

When done, send a message to the team lead.


<teammate-message teammate_id="gherkin-reviewer-p2" color="blue" summary="Phase 2 Gherkin review approved, no gaps">
Phase 2 Gherkin review is complete. Review saved to `work/phase-2/gherkin-review.md`.

**Verdict: APPROVED**

- 139 discrete requirements identified across Steps 2.1-2.5
- 145 Gherkin scenarios written (6 extra scenarios beyond strict spec count, all additive)
- Every requirement has a corresponding scenario
- Every Pest test case from the roadmap Section 3 (HandleGeneratorTest: 6, ProductCrudTest: 13, VariantTest: 8, InventoryTest: 8, CollectionTest: 7, MediaUploadTest: 6) is mapped
- No gaps found
- Consistent with Phase 1 (foundation dependencies correct) and Phase 3/4 (no premature dependencies)
- CartVersionTest correctly excluded (belongs to Phase 4)
- No em-dash characters found
</teammate-message>

<teammate-message teammate_id="gherkin-reviewer-p2" color="blue">
{"type":"idle_notification","from":"gherkin-reviewer-p2","timestamp":"2026-03-20T07:28:46.161Z","idleReason":"available"}
</teammate-message>


Approved with no gaps. Let me send to the Controller for approval, then shut down the BDD/reviewer and start the developer.


SendMessage

Phase 2 Gherkin specs are ready for your review. Please read both files and apply acceptance criteria A:

1. `work/phase-2/gherkin-specs.md` - 145 Gherkin scenarios covering Steps 2.1-2.5
2. `work/phase-2/gherkin-review.md` - Reviewer confirms 139 requirements, 145 scenarios, no gaps

Criteria:
- [ ] Both files exist
- [ ] Traceability table maps every spec requirement to a Gherkin scenario
- [ ] Reviewer provides written confirmation with exact counts
- [ ] Both contain substantive self-assessments
- [ ] Concerns addressed or acknowledged

Respond with APPROVE or VETO.

Summary: Review Phase 2 Gherkin specs

Phase 2 Gherkin specs are ready for your review. Please read both files and apply acceptance criteria A:

1. `work/phase-2/gherkin-specs.md` - 145 Gherkin scenarios covering Steps 2.1-2.5
2. `work/phase-2/gherkin-review.md` - Reviewer confirms 139 requirements, 145 scenarios, no gaps

Criteria:
- [ ] Both files exist
- [ ] Traceability table maps every spec requirement to a Gherkin scenario
- [ ] Reviewer provides written confirmation with exact counts
- [ ] Both contain substantive self-assessments
- [ ] Concerns addressed or acknowledged

Respond with APPROVE or VETO.


Message sent to controller's inbox

Summary: Review Phase 2 Gherkin specs

Phase 2 Gherkin specs are ready for your review. Please read both files and apply acceptance criteria A:

1. `work/phase-2/gherkin-specs.md` - 145 Gherkin scenarios covering Steps 2.1-2.5
2. `work/phase-2/gherkin-review.md` - Reviewer confirms 139 requirements, 145 scenarios, no gaps

Criteria:
- [ ] Both files exist
- [ ] Traceability table maps every spec requirement to a Gherkin scenario
- [ ] Reviewer provides written confirmation with exact counts
- [ ] Both contain substantive self-assessments
- [ ] Concerns addressed or acknowledged

Respond with APPROVE or VETO.

Message sent to controller's inbox

Summary: Review Phase 2 Gherkin specs


Phase 2 Gherkin specs approved by reviewer. Your work is complete.

Phase 2 Gherkin specs approved by reviewer. Your work is complete.


Shutdown request sent to bdd-expert-p2. Request ID: shutdown-1773991736779@bdd-expert-p2


Phase 2 Gherkin review complete. Your work is done.

Phase 2 Gherkin review complete. Your work is done.


Shutdown request sent to gherkin-reviewer-p2. Request ID: shutdown-1773991737193@gherkin-reviewer-p2


Waiting for Controller approval on Phase 2 Gherkin specs before spawning the developer.


<teammate-message teammate_id="system">
{"type":"teammate_terminated","message":"gherkin-reviewer-p2 has shut down."}
</teammate-message>


Waiting for the Controller's Phase 2 Gherkin review.


<teammate-message teammate_id="system">
{"type":"teammate_terminated","message":"bdd-expert-p2 has shut down."}
</teammate-message>

<teammate-message teammate_id="controller" color="blue" summary="APPROVE verdict for Phase 2 Gherkin specs">
## Phase 2 Gherkin Specs -- Controller Review

**Verdict: APPROVE**

I have read both files in full (gherkin-specs.md: 1256 lines; gherkin-review.md: 166 lines). Assessment against Criterion A sub-criteria:

---

### A1. Both files exist -- PASS

- `work/phase-2/gherkin-specs.md`: 1256 lines, 18 Gherkin feature blocks, traceability table, self-assessment
- `work/phase-2/gherkin-review.md`: 166 lines, per-step requirement breakdown, Pest test plan alignment, self-assessment

### A2. Traceability table maps every spec requirement to a Gherkin scenario -- PASS

The traceability table (lines 1170-1217 of gherkin-specs.md) contains 38 rows covering:
- 9 migration tables (Step 2.1)
- 7 models + 6 enums (Step 2.2)
- 4 ProductService methods + VariantMatrixService + HandleGenerator + SKU uniqueness (Step 2.3)
- 5 InventoryService methods + auto-creation (Step 2.4)
- Livewire upload + ProcessMediaUpload job (Step 2.5)
- 6 Pest test file mappings

The review file's per-step breakdown confirms all requirements as "Complete" in every row. No requirement is left unmapped.

I cross-checked the review's table counts against the specs:
- Step 2.1: 34 scenarios for 9 tables -- verified in specs (products: 4, product_options: 3, product_option_values: 3, product_variants: 4, variant_option_values: 3, inventory_items: 4, collections: 5, collection_products: 3, product_media: 5 = 34)
- Step 2.2: 41 scenarios for 7 models + 6 enums -- verified (Product: 8, ProductOption: 2, ProductOptionValue: 1, ProductVariant: 5, InventoryItem: 3, Collection: 4, ProductMedia: 3, enums: 15 = 41)
- Step 2.3: 46 scenarios -- verified (create: 3, update: 1, transitionStatus: 11, delete: 3, rebuildMatrix: 7, HandleGenerator: 7, SKU: 4, Product CRUD: 3, Collection CRUD: 7 = 46)
- Step 2.4: 16 scenarios -- verified (checkAvailability: 4, reserve: 4, release: 2, commit: 3, restock: 2, auto-creation: 1 = 16)
- Step 2.5: 8 scenarios -- verified (Livewire upload: 5, ProcessMediaUpload: 3 = 8)

Total: 34 + 41 + 46 + 16 + 8 = 145 scenarios. Matches the claimed count.

### A3. Reviewer provides written confirmation with exact count -- PASS

The review file states at lines 5-7:
- "145 Gherkin scenarios written covering 139 discrete requirements identified across Steps 2.1 through 2.5, plus 6 additional Pest test plan items."
- Verdict: "APPROVED"

The 6 "additional" items are scenarios that go beyond the strict spec requirements but align with Pest test plan entries (e.g., collections table for HandleGenerator, 3-way cartesian product, transaction wrapping). These are additive, not missing requirements.

Gaps found: "None" (line 152). Three minor observations are noted but explicitly classified as not-gaps.

### A4. Both contain substantive self-assessments -- PASS

**gherkin-specs.md self-assessment (lines 1220-1256):** Covers each of the 5 steps individually, explains coverage completeness, discusses Pest test alignment with test file names and counts, and identifies 3 specific gaps/risks (product_media.updated_at intentionally absent, collection status transitions limited to spec level, ProcessMediaUpload failure detail limited to spec level).

**gherkin-review.md self-assessment (lines 161-165):** Provides confidence level (95%), explains what could be missing (transaction scenarios, concurrent access), and notes the em-dash check was performed.

Both self-assessments are substantive. They identify specific areas of uncertainty and explain decisions rather than offering boilerplate assurance.

### A5. Concerns addressed or acknowledged -- PASS

- The review's 3 minor observations (lines 154-157) are all explicitly classified as "not gaps" with explanations.
- The specs' 3 identified risks are honest about what the spec does not define (collection state machine, media failure triggers) and explain that the Gherkin follows the spec's level of detail.
- Pest test plan alignment is verified per-file (lines 119-128 of review), confirming the Gherkin is a superset of the test plan in every case.
- Phase consistency is verified against Phase 1 (Foundation), Phase 3 (Themes), and Phase 4 (Cart) with no conflicts identified.

---

No issues found. All five sub-criteria pass. Ready to proceed.
</teammate-message>

<teammate-message teammate_id="controller" color="blue">
{"type":"idle_notification","from":"controller","timestamp":"2026-03-20T07:30:00.539Z","idleReason":"available"}
</teammate-message>

<teammate-message teammate_id="gherkin-reviewer-p2" color="blue">
{"type":"shutdown_approved","requestId":"shutdown-1773991737193@gherkin-reviewer-p2","from":"gherkin-reviewer-p2","timestamp":"2026-03-20T07:29:00.572Z","paneId":"in-process","backendType":"in-process"}
</teammate-message>

<teammate-message teammate_id="bdd-expert-p2" color="red">
{"type":"shutdown_approved","requestId":"shutdown-1773991736779@bdd-expert-p2","from":"bdd-expert-p2","timestamp":"2026-03-20T07:29:00.870Z","paneId":"in-process","backendType":"in-process"}
</teammate-message>


Phase 2 Gherkin specs APPROVED by Controller. Spawning the Phase 2 developer now.


Agent

Phase 2 Backend Developer

Prompt:
You are the **Backend Developer** for Phase 2: Catalog (Products, Variants, Inventory, Collections, Media) of the shop project.

## Your Task
Implement Phase 2 using TDD with Pest, following the approved Gherkin specs in `work/phase-2/gherkin-specs.md` and the roadmap in `specs/09-IMPLEMENTATION-ROADMAP.md` (Steps 2.1-2.5).

## IMPORTANT: Use Available Tools
- Use `search-docs` MCP tool to search Laravel/Livewire docs before implementing
- Use `database-schema` to inspect existing tables
- Use `application-info` for app context
- Activate `pest-testing` skill when writing tests
- Activate `livewire-development` skill for Livewire components

## Context: What Phase 1 Built
Phase 1 created the foundation: Organization, Store, StoreDomain, StoreUser, StoreSettings, Customer, User models. BelongsToStore trait + StoreScope for tenant isolation. ResolveStore middleware. Auth (admin + customer). Authorization policies.

## Implementation Order (strictly sequential)

### Step 2.1: Migrations (9 tables in dependency order)
1. `create_products_table` - FK: store_id. Columns: title, handle, description_html, status (TEXT CHECK), vendor, product_type, tags_json, template_suffix, published_at, seo_title, seo_description
2. `create_product_options_table` - FK: product_id. Columns: name, position
3. `create_product_option_values_table` - FK: product_option_id. Columns: value, position
4. `create_product_variants_table` - FK: product_id. Columns: title, sku (nullable), barcode (nullable), price_amount (INTEGER cents), compare_at_price_amount (nullable INTEGER), cost_amount (nullable INTEGER), weight_grams (nullable), requires_shipping (boolean default true), is_taxable (boolean default true), is_default (boolean default false), status (TEXT CHECK), position
5. `create_variant_option_values_table` - composite PK: variant_id + product_option_value_id
6. `create_inventory_items_table` - FK: store_id, variant_id. Columns: quantity_on_hand (default 0), quantity_reserved (default 0), policy (TEXT CHECK deny/continue, default deny)
7. `create_collections_table` - FK: store_id. Columns: title, handle, description_html, status (TEXT CHECK), sort_order, seo_title, seo_description, published_at
8. `create_collection_products_table` - composite PK: collection_id + product_id. Column: position
9. `create_product_media_table` - FK: product_id. Columns: type (TEXT CHECK), url, alt_text, position, width, height, mime_type, file_size, status (TEXT CHECK), variants_json

All monetary amounts as INTEGER (cents). Use `php artisan make:migration`.

### Step 2.2: Models with Relationships
Create each model with factory and seeder using `php artisan make:model -mfs --no-interaction`:

**Product**: BelongsToStore, hasMany(ProductOption), hasMany(ProductVariant), hasMany(ProductMedia), belongsToMany(Collection) via collection_products. Casts: status -> ProductStatus, tags_json -> array.

**ProductOption**: belongsTo(Product), hasMany(ProductOptionValue)

**ProductOptionValue**: belongsTo(ProductOption)

**ProductVariant**: belongsTo(Product), hasOne(InventoryItem), belongsToMany(ProductOptionValue) via variant_option_values. Casts: status -> VariantStatus, price_amount/compare_at_price_amount/cost_amount -> integer.

**InventoryItem**: BelongsToStore, belongsTo(ProductVariant). Casts: policy -> InventoryPolicy.

**Collection**: BelongsToStore, belongsToMany(Product) via collection_products. Casts: status -> CollectionStatus.

**ProductMedia**: belongsTo(Product). Casts: type -> MediaType, status -> MediaStatus, variants_json -> array.

**Enums to create in app/Enums/:**
- ProductStatus: Draft, Active, Archived
- VariantStatus: Active, Archived
- CollectionStatus: Draft, Active, Archived
- MediaType: Image, Video
- MediaStatus: Processing, Ready, Failed
- InventoryPolicy: Deny, Continue

### Step 2.3: Services
**ProductService** (`app/Services/ProductService.php`):
- `create(Store $store, array $data): Product` - creates product with default variant
- `update(Product $product, array $data): Product`
- `transitionStatus(Product $product, ProductStatus $newStatus): void` - validates state machine (draft->active requires priced variant, active->draft blocked if orders exist, sets published_at)
- `delete(Product $product): void` - hard delete only if draft with no order refs

**VariantMatrixService** (`app/Services/VariantMatrixService.php`):
- `rebuildMatrix(Product $product): void` - cartesian product of options, creates missing variants, archives orphaned ones (or deletes if no order refs)

**HandleGenerator** (`app/Support/HandleGenerator.php`):
- `generate(string $title, string $table, int $storeId, ?int $excludeId = null): string` - unique slugs with collision handling (-1, -2 suffixes), store-scoped

### Step 2.4: Inventory Service
**InventoryService** (`app/Services/InventoryService.php`):
- `checkAvailability(InventoryItem $item, int $quantity): bool`
- `reserve(InventoryItem $item, int $quantity): void` - throws InsufficientInventoryException when policy=deny and insufficient
- `release(InventoryItem $item, int $quantity): void`
- `commit(InventoryItem $item, int $quantity): void` - decrements both on_hand and reserved
- `restock(InventoryItem $item, int $quantity): void`
All operations in DB transactions.

**Exception**: `app/Exceptions/InsufficientInventoryException.php`

### Step 2.5: Media Upload
**ProcessMediaUpload** job (`app/Jobs/ProcessMediaUpload.php`):
- Resizes images to 3 sizes: thumbnail 150x150, medium 600x600, large 1200x1200
- Updates ProductMedia status from processing to ready (or failed)
- Stored on local public disk

## Pest Tests to Create
Reference the Pest test spec in `specs/09-IMPLEMENTATION-ROADMAP.md` Section 3. Create:
- `tests/Unit/HandleGeneratorTest.php` (6 tests)
- `tests/Feature/Products/ProductCrudTest.php` (13 tests)
- `tests/Feature/Products/VariantTest.php` (8 tests)
- `tests/Feature/Products/InventoryTest.php` (8 tests)
- `tests/Feature/Products/CollectionTest.php` (7 tests)
- `tests/Feature/Products/MediaUploadTest.php` (6 tests)

Use `createStoreContext()` helper in tests/Pest.php if it exists, or create one.

## When Done
1. Run `vendor/bin/pint --dirty --format agent`
2. Run `php artisan test --compact` to verify ALL tests pass (Phase 1 + Phase 2)
3. Write `work/phase-2/dev-report.md` with: what was built, architecture decisions, Pest tests mapped to Gherkin, deviations, known limitations, self-assessment
4. Send a message to the team lead

## Rules
- Use `php artisan make:` commands
- Pass `--no-interaction` to artisan
- Follow clean code, SOLID, Laravel best practices
- Proper Eloquent relationships with return types
- PHP 8 constructor promotion, enums, match expressions
- Never use em-dash characters
- Run tests frequently
- Do not commit - team lead handles git


Spawned successfully.
agent_id: dev-backend-p2@vivid-launching-llama
name: dev-backend-p2
team_name: vivid-launching-llama
The agent is now running and will receive instructions via mailbox.

Prompt:
You are the **Backend Developer** for Phase 2: Catalog (Products, Variants, Inventory, Collections, Media) of the shop project.

## Your Task
Implement Phase 2 using TDD with Pest, following the approved Gherkin specs in `work/phase-2/gherkin-specs.md` and the roadmap in `specs/09-IMPLEMENTATION-ROADMAP.md` (Steps 2.1-2.5).

## IMPORTANT: Use Available Tools
- Use `search-docs` MCP tool to search Laravel/Livewire docs before implementing
- Use `database-schema` to inspect existing tables
- Use `application-info` for app context
- Activate `pest-testing` skill when writing tests
- Activate `livewire-development` skill for Livewire components

## Context: What Phase 1 Built
Phase 1 created the foundation: Organization, Store, StoreDomain, StoreUser, StoreSettings, Customer, User models. BelongsToStore trait + StoreScope for tenant isolation. ResolveStore middleware. Auth (admin + customer). Authorization policies.

## Implementation Order (strictly sequential)

### Step 2.1: Migrations (9 tables in dependency order)
1. `create_products_table` - FK: store_id. Columns: title, handle, description_html, status (TEXT CHECK), vendor, product_type, tags_json, template_suffix, published_at, seo_title, seo_description
2. `create_product_options_table` - FK: product_id. Columns: name, position
3. `create_product_option_values_table` - FK: product_option_id. Columns: value, position
4. `create_product_variants_table` - FK: product_id. Columns: title, sku (nullable), barcode (nullable), price_amount (INTEGER cents), compare_at_price_amount (nullable INTEGER), cost_amount (nullable INTEGER), weight_grams (nullable), requires_shipping (boolean default true), is_taxable (boolean default true), is_default (boolean default false), status (TEXT CHECK), position
5. `create_variant_option_values_table` - composite PK: variant_id + product_option_value_id
6. `create_inventory_items_table` - FK: store_id, variant_id. Columns: quantity_on_hand (default 0), quantity_reserved (default 0), policy (TEXT CHECK deny/continue, default deny)
7. `create_collections_table` - FK: store_id. Columns: title, handle, description_html, status (TEXT CHECK), sort_order, seo_title, seo_description, published_at
8. `create_collection_products_table` - composite PK: collection_id + product_id. Column: position
9. `create_product_media_table` - FK: product_id. Columns: type (TEXT CHECK), url, alt_text, position, width, height, mime_type, file_size, status (TEXT CHECK), variants_json

All monetary amounts as INTEGER (cents). Use `php artisan make:migration`.

### Step 2.2: Models with Relationships
Create each model with factory and seeder using `php artisan make:model -mfs --no-interaction`:

**Product**: BelongsToStore, hasMany(ProductOption), hasMany(ProductVariant), hasMany(ProductMedia), belongsToMany(Collection) via collection_products. Casts: status -> ProductStatus, tags_json -> array.

**ProductOption**: belongsTo(Product), hasMany(ProductOptionValue)

**ProductOptionValue**: belongsTo(ProductOption)

**ProductVariant**: belongsTo(Product), hasOne(InventoryItem), belongsToMany(ProductOptionValue) via variant_option_values. Casts: status -> VariantStatus, price_amount/compare_at_price_amount/cost_amount -> integer.

**InventoryItem**: BelongsToStore, belongsTo(ProductVariant). Casts: policy -> InventoryPolicy.

**Collection**: BelongsToStore, belongsToMany(Product) via collection_products. Casts: status -> CollectionStatus.

**ProductMedia**: belongsTo(Product). Casts: type -> MediaType, status -> MediaStatus, variants_json -> array.

**Enums to create in app/Enums/:**
- ProductStatus: Draft, Active, Archived
- VariantStatus: Active, Archived
- CollectionStatus: Draft, Active, Archived
- MediaType: Image, Video
- MediaStatus: Processing, Ready, Failed
- InventoryPolicy: Deny, Continue

### Step 2.3: Services
**ProductService** (`app/Services/ProductService.php`):
- `create(Store $store, array $data): Product` - creates product with default variant
- `update(Product $product, array $data): Product`
- `transitionStatus(Product $product, ProductStatus $newStatus): void` - validates state machine (draft->active requires priced variant, active->draft blocked if orders exist, sets published_at)
- `delete(Product $product): void` - hard delete only if draft with no order refs

**VariantMatrixService** (`app/Services/VariantMatrixService.php`):
- `rebuildMatrix(Product $product): void` - cartesian product of options, creates missing variants, archives orphaned ones (or deletes if no order refs)

**HandleGenerator** (`app/Support/HandleGenerator.php`):
- `generate(string $title, string $table, int $storeId, ?int $excludeId = null): string` - unique slugs with collision handling (-1, -2 suffixes), store-scoped

### Step 2.4: Inventory Service
**InventoryService** (`app/Services/InventoryService.php`):
- `checkAvailability(InventoryItem $item, int $quantity): bool`
- `reserve(InventoryItem $item, int $quantity): void` - throws InsufficientInventoryException when policy=deny and insufficient
- `release(InventoryItem $item, int $quantity): void`
- `commit(InventoryItem $item, int $quantity): void` - decrements both on_hand and reserved
- `restock(InventoryItem $item, int $quantity): void`
All operations in DB transactions.

**Exception**: `app/Exceptions/InsufficientInventoryException.php`

### Step 2.5: Media Upload
**ProcessMediaUpload** job (`app/Jobs/ProcessMediaUpload.php`):
- Resizes images to 3 sizes: thumbnail 150x150, medium 600x600, large 1200x1200
- Updates ProductMedia status from processing to ready (or failed)
- Stored on local public disk

## Pest Tests to Create
Reference the Pest test spec in `specs/09-IMPLEMENTATION-ROADMAP.md` Section 3. Create:
- `tests/Unit/HandleGeneratorTest.php` (6 tests)
- `tests/Feature/Products/ProductCrudTest.php` (13 tests)
- `tests/Feature/Products/VariantTest.php` (8 tests)
- `tests/Feature/Products/InventoryTest.php` (8 tests)
- `tests/Feature/Products/CollectionTest.php` (7 tests)
- `tests/Feature/Products/MediaUploadTest.php` (6 tests)

Use `createStoreContext()` helper in tests/Pest.php if it exists, or create one.

## When Done
1. Run `vendor/bin/pint --dirty --format agent`
2. Run `php artisan test --compact` to verify ALL tests pass (Phase 1 + Phase 2)
3. Write `work/phase-2/dev-report.md` with: what was built, architecture decisions, Pest tests mapped to Gherkin, deviations, known limitations, self-assessment
4. Send a message to the team lead

## Rules
- Use `php artisan make:` commands
- Pass `--no-interaction` to artisan
- Follow clean code, SOLID, Laravel best practices
- Proper Eloquent relationships with return types
- PHP 8 constructor promotion, enums, match expressions
- Never use em-dash characters
- Run tests frequently
- Do not commit - team lead handles git


Phase 2 developer is now working on implementation. Waiting for completion.


<teammate-message teammate_id="dev-backend-p2" color="green" summary="Phase 2 complete: 48 tests, 283 total passing">
Phase 2: Catalog implementation is complete. All tests pass.

**Summary of what was built:**

**Migrations (9 tables):** products, product_options, product_option_values, product_variants, variant_option_values, inventory_items, collections, collection_products, product_media. All with proper FKs, indexes, and SQLite CHECK constraint triggers.

**Models (7):** Product, ProductOption, ProductOptionValue, ProductVariant, InventoryItem, Collection, ProductMedia. All with proper relationships, casts, and factories.

**Enums (7):** ProductStatus, VariantStatus, CollectionStatus, CollectionType, MediaType, MediaStatus, InventoryPolicy.

**Services (3):** ProductService (CRUD + state machine), VariantMatrixService (cartesian product matrix rebuild), InventoryService (reserve/release/commit/restock with transactions).

**Support:** HandleGenerator (unique store-scoped slug generation), ProcessMediaUpload job, InsufficientInventoryException, InvalidProductTransitionException.

**Factories (7):** With meaningful defaults and state methods.

**Seeder:** ProductSeeder with sample T-shirt (options matrix) + Hoodie + 2 collections.

**Tests: 48 new tests, all passing. 283 total tests pass (235 Phase 1 + 48 Phase 2).**
- HandleGeneratorTest: 6 tests
- ProductCrudTest: 13 tests
- VariantTest: 8 tests
- InventoryTest: 8 tests
- CollectionTest: 7 tests
- MediaUploadTest: 6 tests

**Pint formatting applied.** Dev report written to `work/phase-2/dev-report.md`.

**Key files:**
- Migrations: `database/migrations/2026_03_20_0732*`
- Models: `app/Models/Product.php`, `ProductOption.php`, `ProductOptionValue.php`, `ProductVariant.php`, `InventoryItem.php`, `Collection.php`, `ProductMedia.php`
- Services: `app/Services/ProductService.php`, `VariantMatrixService.php`, `InventoryService.php`
- Support: `app/Support/HandleGenerator.php`
- Tests: `tests/Feature/Products/` and `tests/Feature/HandleGeneratorTest.php`
</teammate-message>


Phase 2 development complete with 48 new tests. Spawning the Code Reviewer.


Phase 2 Code Reviewer

Prompt:
You are the **Code Reviewer** for Phase 2: Catalog of the shop project.

## Your Task
Review ALL code written in Phase 2 for clean code, SOLID, and Laravel best practices. Produce a report at `work/phase-2/code-review.md`.

## What Was Implemented
Read `work/phase-2/dev-report.md` for details. Key areas:

**Migrations:** 9 new tables (products, product_options, product_option_values, product_variants, variant_option_values, inventory_items, collections, collection_products, product_media)

**Models:** Product, ProductOption, ProductOptionValue, ProductVariant, InventoryItem, Collection, ProductMedia (check `app/Models/`)

**Enums:** ProductStatus, VariantStatus, CollectionStatus, MediaType, MediaStatus, InventoryPolicy (check `app/Enums/`)

**Services:** ProductService, VariantMatrixService, InventoryService (check `app/Services/`)

**Support:** HandleGenerator (check `app/Support/`), ProcessMediaUpload job (check `app/Jobs/`), InsufficientInventoryException (check `app/Exceptions/`)

**Tests:** 48 tests in tests/Feature/Products/ and tests/Unit/

## Review Checklist (10 items, each PASS or FAIL)
1. Code Style - Pint compliance (0 violations)
2. Type Safety - Return types, parameter types on all methods
3. Eloquent Best Practices - Proper relationships, no raw queries, eager loading
4. Security - Input validation, no SQL injection, proper authorization
5. SOLID Principles - SRP, DI, ISP
6. PHP 8 Features - Constructor promotion, enums, match
7. Test Quality - Meaningful tests, edge cases, factories, proper assertions
8. Laravel Conventions - Proper models, services, jobs
9. Code Duplication - No significant duplication
10. Error Handling - Proper exceptions, no silent failures

## Steps
1. Run `vendor/bin/pint --test --format agent` for style check
2. Run `php artisan test --compact` to verify tests pass
3. Review each file for the criteria above
4. Write `work/phase-2/code-review.md` with metrics, PASS/FAIL per item, static analysis numbers, self-assessment (1-10 rating)
5. If FAIL issues found, tell the team lead what needs fixing

Never use em-dash characters. Send a message to the team lead when done.


Spawned successfully.
agent_id: code-reviewer-p2@vivid-launching-llama
name: code-reviewer-p2
team_name: vivid-launching-llama
The agent is now running and will receive instructions via mailbox.

Prompt:
You are the **Code Reviewer** for Phase 2: Catalog of the shop project.

## Your Task
Review ALL code written in Phase 2 for clean code, SOLID, and Laravel best practices. Produce a report at `work/phase-2/code-review.md`.

## What Was Implemented
Read `work/phase-2/dev-report.md` for details. Key areas:

**Migrations:** 9 new tables (products, product_options, product_option_values, product_variants, variant_option_values, inventory_items, collections, collection_products, product_media)

**Models:** Product, ProductOption, ProductOptionValue, ProductVariant, InventoryItem, Collection, ProductMedia (check `app/Models/`)

**Enums:** ProductStatus, VariantStatus, CollectionStatus, MediaType, MediaStatus, InventoryPolicy (check `app/Enums/`)

**Services:** ProductService, VariantMatrixService, InventoryService (check `app/Services/`)

**Support:** HandleGenerator (check `app/Support/`), ProcessMediaUpload job (check `app/Jobs/`), InsufficientInventoryException (check `app/Exceptions/`)

**Tests:** 48 tests in tests/Feature/Products/ and tests/Unit/

## Review Checklist (10 items, each PASS or FAIL)
1. Code Style - Pint compliance (0 violations)
2. Type Safety - Return types, parameter types on all methods
3. Eloquent Best Practices - Proper relationships, no raw queries, eager loading
4. Security - Input validation, no SQL injection, proper authorization
5. SOLID Principles - SRP, DI, ISP
6. PHP 8 Features - Constructor promotion, enums, match
7. Test Quality - Meaningful tests, edge cases, factories, proper assertions
8. Laravel Conventions - Proper models, services, jobs
9. Code Duplication - No significant duplication
10. Error Handling - Proper exceptions, no silent failures

## Steps
1. Run `vendor/bin/pint --test --format agent` for style check
2. Run `php artisan test --compact` to verify tests pass
3. Review each file for the criteria above
4. Write `work/phase-2/code-review.md` with metrics, PASS/FAIL per item, static analysis numbers, self-assessment (1-10 rating)
5. If FAIL issues found, tell the team lead what needs fixing

Never use em-dash characters. Send a message to the team lead when done.


Standard Intelephense false positives - `DB` facade in migrations, model cross-references not yet indexed, `$attributes` in factory callbacks, and Intervention Image types. The code reviewer will evaluate the actual code quality. Waiting for the review.


<teammate-message teammate_id="dev-backend-p2" color="green">
{"type":"idle_notification","from":"dev-backend-p2","timestamp":"2026-03-20T07:41:51.445Z","idleReason":"available"}
</teammate-message>


Developer idle, waiting for code reviewer to complete.